It should have a high degree of self-awareness, which is the ability to recognize that the advantages of a society come from its people.
The concept behind comparative advantage is that a nation should have a high degree of self-awareness. This means that every member of a society should have a good idea of what the strengths and weaknesses are of this society. If you have a good idea of what a society is good at, you’ll have the means to make everyone more efficient and efficient.
The problem with a culture that is truly self-aware is that it can be hard to distinguish the “good” and “bad” parts of a society. A self-aware society is one in which people are aware of the strengths and weaknesses of their society and seek to improve them. The problem is that in a culture that does not know what it is good at, it is easy to do bad things because there is no incentive to do good things.
Comparative advantage, is defined as “the ability to out compete” people with which one has historically been outcompeted. In the case of a society that has forgotten what it is good at, you can make people outcompete them in all sorts of ways to ensure you get better at whatever it is that you are good at.
The problem with comparative advantage is that it is difficult to understand. We can look at the advantages of a nation’s economy or its military, but we are in no position to explain what it is that makes a country good at doing one thing or another. And as a result, we often end up making the wrong decisions, especially since the world has changed so much in the last few decades.
The real reason for the two-sidedness between a nation and its citizens is because those decisions are based on a single person, and it’s not even possible to make a nation outcompetent, because you have to compete with people. However, any society that’s competing with the majority of people in that economy, it’s possible for a nation, like a nation, to be outcompeted by people who are not equally as good as those who are.